Grenada vs Nauru: Control of Corruption - Governance score (0-100) (Control score 0-100)
Control of Corruption - Governance score (0-100) (Control score 0-100) over time
- Grenada
- Nauru
How they compare
Grenada currently reports 58.22 0-100 against 57.25 0-100 in Nauru, a difference of 0.97 0-100.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Grenada ahead.
Grenada ranks 69th and Nauru ranks 72nd of 208 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Grenada averaged higher in 2 and Nauru in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Grenada | Nauru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 57.36 0-100 | 44.49 0-100 | 12.87 0-100 | Grenada |
| 2010s | 57.43 0-100 | 52.52 0-100 | 4.91 0-100 | Grenada |
| 2020s | 56.04 0-100 | 57.24 0-100 | 1.2 0-100 | Nauru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher control of corruption - governance score, Grenada or Nauru?
- Grenada, at 58.22 0-100 against 57.25 0-100 in Nauru as of 2025.
- What is the difference in control of corruption - governance score between Grenada and Nauru?
- 0.97 0-100, with Grenada ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Grenada and Nauru?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2025.
- How do Grenada and Nauru rank globally for control of corruption - governance score?
- Grenada ranks 69th and Nauru ranks 72nd of 208 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Control of Corruption - Governance score (0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Control of Corruption (CC) captures perceptions of the extent to which public power is used for private gain, including both petty and grand corruption, as well as capture of the state by elites and private interests. Governance score is a linear transformation of the governance estimate using hypothetical worst-case and base-case countries. It is an absolute score ranging from 0-100. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) confidence intervals (lower and upper bound). The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance score (respectively the underlying governance estimate) is based. The confidence intervals include the lower and upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Confidence intervals are a statistical range of values that likely contain the true value (of what is being estimated).