Greenland vs Hong Kong: Control of Corruption - Governance score
Control of Corruption - Governance score over time
- Greenland
- Hong Kong
How they compare
Hong Kong currently reports 79.68 0-100 against 77.87 0-100 in Greenland, a difference of 1.81 0-100.
Across all 16 years both countries report, Hong Kong has been ahead every year.
Greenland ranks 21st and Hong Kong ranks 18th of 204 countries.
Hong Kong has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Greenland | Hong Kong | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 68.61 0-100 | 81.03 0-100 | 12.41 0-100 | Hong Kong |
| 2010s | 69.26 0-100 | 81.57 0-100 | 12.3 0-100 | Hong Kong |
| 2020s | 70.83 0-100 | 80.15 0-100 | 9.32 0-100 | Hong Kong |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher control of corruption - governance score, Greenland or Hong Kong?
- Hong Kong, at 79.68 0-100 against 77.87 0-100 in Greenland as of 2024.
- What is the difference in control of corruption - governance score between Greenland and Hong Kong?
- 1.81 0-100, with Hong Kong ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Greenland and Hong Kong?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2024.
- How do Greenland and Hong Kong rank globally for control of corruption - governance score?
- Greenland ranks 21st and Hong Kong ranks 18th of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Control of Corruption - Governance score (0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Control of Corruption (CC) captures perceptions of the extent to which public power is used for private gain, including both petty and grand corruption, as well as capture of the state by elites and private interests. Governance score is a linear transformation of the governance estimate using hypothetical worst-case and base-case countries. It is an absolute score ranging from 0-100. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) confidence intervals (lower and upper bound). The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance score (respectively the underlying governance estimate) is based. The confidence intervals include the lower and upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Confidence intervals are a statistical range of values that likely contain the true value (of what is being estimated).