French Polynesia vs Tunisia: Control of Corruption - Governance score (0-100) (Control score 0-100)
Control of Corruption - Governance score (0-100) (Control score 0-100) over time
- French Polynesia
- Tunisia
How they compare
French Polynesia currently reports 44.06 0-100 against 43.93 0-100 in Tunisia, a difference of 0.13 0-100.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2021 it was Tunisia ahead.
French Polynesia ranks 103rd and Tunisia ranks 104th of 208 countries.
Tunisia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher control of corruption - governance score, French Polynesia or Tunisia?
- French Polynesia, at 44.06 0-100 against 43.93 0-100 in Tunisia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in control of corruption - governance score between French Polynesia and Tunisia?
- 0.13 0-100, with French Polynesia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for French Polynesia and Tunisia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2021 to 2025.
- How do French Polynesia and Tunisia rank globally for control of corruption - governance score?
- French Polynesia ranks 103rd and Tunisia ranks 104th of 208 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Control of Corruption - Governance score (0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Control of Corruption (CC) captures perceptions of the extent to which public power is used for private gain, including both petty and grand corruption, as well as capture of the state by elites and private interests. Governance score is a linear transformation of the governance estimate using hypothetical worst-case and base-case countries. It is an absolute score ranging from 0-100. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) confidence intervals (lower and upper bound). The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance score (respectively the underlying governance estimate) is based. The confidence intervals include the lower and upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Confidence intervals are a statistical range of values that likely contain the true value (of what is being estimated).