French Polynesia vs Solomon Islands: Control of Corruption - Governance score (0-100) (Control score 0-100)
Control of Corruption - Governance score (0-100) (Control score 0-100) over time
- French Polynesia
- Solomon Islands
How they compare
Solomon Islands currently reports 44.92 0-100 against 44.06 0-100 in French Polynesia, a difference of 0.86 0-100.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Solomon Islands has been ahead every year.
French Polynesia ranks 103rd and Solomon Islands ranks 101st of 208 countries.
Solomon Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher control of corruption - governance score, French Polynesia or Solomon Islands?
- Solomon Islands, at 44.92 0-100 against 44.06 0-100 in French Polynesia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in control of corruption - governance score between French Polynesia and Solomon Islands?
- 0.86 0-100, with Solomon Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for French Polynesia and Solomon Islands?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2021 to 2025.
- How do French Polynesia and Solomon Islands rank globally for control of corruption - governance score?
- French Polynesia ranks 103rd and Solomon Islands ranks 101st of 208 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Control of Corruption - Governance score (0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Control of Corruption (CC) captures perceptions of the extent to which public power is used for private gain, including both petty and grand corruption, as well as capture of the state by elites and private interests. Governance score is a linear transformation of the governance estimate using hypothetical worst-case and base-case countries. It is an absolute score ranging from 0-100. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) confidence intervals (lower and upper bound). The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance score (respectively the underlying governance estimate) is based. The confidence intervals include the lower and upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Confidence intervals are a statistical range of values that likely contain the true value (of what is being estimated).