Brazil vs East Timor: Control of Corruption - Governance score
Control of Corruption - Governance score over time
- Brazil
- East Timor
How they compare
East Timor currently reports 40.21 0-100 against 39.58 0-100 in Brazil, a difference of 0.63 0-100.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Brazil ahead.
Brazil ranks 124th and East Timor ranks 121st of 204 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 2 and East Timor in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | East Timor | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 45.75 0-100 | 40.66 0-100 | 5.09 0-100 | Brazil |
| 2010s | 43.64 0-100 | 34.23 0-100 | 9.41 0-100 | Brazil |
| 2020s | 39.52 0-100 | 39.84 0-100 | 0.3141 0-100 | East Timor |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher control of corruption - governance score, Brazil or East Timor?
- East Timor, at 40.21 0-100 against 39.58 0-100 in Brazil as of 2024.
- What is the difference in control of corruption - governance score between Brazil and East Timor?
- 0.63 0-100, with East Timor ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and East Timor?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Brazil and East Timor rank globally for control of corruption - governance score?
- Brazil ranks 124th and East Timor ranks 121st of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Control of Corruption - Governance score (0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Control of Corruption (CC) captures perceptions of the extent to which public power is used for private gain, including both petty and grand corruption, as well as capture of the state by elites and private interests. Governance score is a linear transformation of the governance estimate using hypothetical worst-case and base-case countries. It is an absolute score ranging from 0-100. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) confidence intervals (lower and upper bound). The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance score (respectively the underlying governance estimate) is based. The confidence intervals include the lower and upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Confidence intervals are a statistical range of values that likely contain the true value (of what is being estimated).