Bhutan vs Greenland: Control of Corruption - Governance score
Control of Corruption - Governance score over time
- Bhutan
- Greenland
How they compare
Greenland currently reports 77.87 0-100 against 77.66 0-100 in Bhutan, a difference of 0.21 0-100.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 16 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Greenland ahead.
Bhutan ranks 22nd and Greenland ranks 21st of 204 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Bhutan averaged higher in 2 and Greenland in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bhutan | Greenland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 63.48 0-100 | 68.61 0-100 | 5.14 0-100 | Greenland |
| 2010s | 69.7 0-100 | 69.26 0-100 | 0.4347 0-100 | Bhutan |
| 2020s | 75.58 0-100 | 70.83 0-100 | 4.75 0-100 | Bhutan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher control of corruption - governance score, Bhutan or Greenland?
- Greenland, at 77.87 0-100 against 77.66 0-100 in Bhutan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in control of corruption - governance score between Bhutan and Greenland?
- 0.21 0-100, with Greenland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Greenland?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2024.
- How do Bhutan and Greenland rank globally for control of corruption - governance score?
- Bhutan ranks 22nd and Greenland ranks 21st of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Control of Corruption - Governance score (0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Control of Corruption (CC) captures perceptions of the extent to which public power is used for private gain, including both petty and grand corruption, as well as capture of the state by elites and private interests. Governance score is a linear transformation of the governance estimate using hypothetical worst-case and base-case countries. It is an absolute score ranging from 0-100. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) confidence intervals (lower and upper bound). The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance score (respectively the underlying governance estimate) is based. The confidence intervals include the lower and upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Confidence intervals are a statistical range of values that likely contain the true value (of what is being estimated).