Bermuda vs San Marino, Republic of: Control of Corruption - Governance score
Control of Corruption - Governance score over time
- Bermuda
- San Marino, Republic of
How they compare
Bermuda currently reports 71.66 0-100 against 71.66 0-100 in San Marino, Republic of, a difference of 0 0-100.
Across all 10 years both countries report, San Marino, Republic of has been ahead every year.
Bermuda ranks 31st and San Marino, Republic of ranks 31st of 204 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bermuda | San Marino, Republic of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 71.58 0-100 | 71.58 0-100 | 0 0-100 | β |
| 2020s | 71.67 0-100 | 71.67 0-100 | 0 0-100 | β |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher control of corruption - governance score, Bermuda or San Marino, Republic of?
- Bermuda, at 71.66 0-100 against 71.66 0-100 in San Marino, Republic of as of 2024.
- What is the difference in control of corruption - governance score between Bermuda and San Marino, Republic of?
- 0 0-100, with Bermuda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bermuda and San Marino, Republic of?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2024.
- How do Bermuda and San Marino, Republic of rank globally for control of corruption - governance score?
- Bermuda ranks 31st and San Marino, Republic of ranks 31st of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Control of Corruption - Governance score (0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Control of Corruption (CC) captures perceptions of the extent to which public power is used for private gain, including both petty and grand corruption, as well as capture of the state by elites and private interests. Governance score is a linear transformation of the governance estimate using hypothetical worst-case and base-case countries. It is an absolute score ranging from 0-100. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) confidence intervals (lower and upper bound). The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance score (respectively the underlying governance estimate) is based. The confidence intervals include the lower and upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Confidence intervals are a statistical range of values that likely contain the true value (of what is being estimated).