Belarus vs Palestine, State of: Control of Corruption - Governance score

Belarus
36.15 0-100
in 2024
Palestine, State of
36.3 0-100
in 2024
Belarus rank
139th
Palestine, State of rank
136th

Control of Corruption - Governance score over time

  • Belarus
  • Palestine, State of
01020304050199620102024

How they compare

Palestine, State of currently reports 36.3 0-100 against 36.15 0-100 in Belarus, a difference of 0.15 0-100.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Palestine, State of ahead.

Belarus ranks 139th and Palestine, State of ranks 136th of 204 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 3 and Palestine, State of in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Palestine, State of Difference Ahead
1990s 42.3 0-100 40.75 0-100 1.55 0-100 Belarus
2000s 38.9 0-100 42.63 0-100 3.72 0-100 Palestine, State of
2010s 43.06 0-100 41.08 0-100 1.98 0-100 Belarus
2020s 40.43 0-100 36.24 0-100 4.19 0-100 Belarus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher control of corruption - governance score, Belarus or Palestine, State of?
Palestine, State of, at 36.3 0-100 against 36.15 0-100 in Belarus as of 2024.
What is the difference in control of corruption - governance score between Belarus and Palestine, State of?
0.15 0-100, with Palestine, State of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Palestine, State of?
26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
How do Belarus and Palestine, State of rank globally for control of corruption - governance score?
Belarus ranks 139th and Palestine, State of ranks 136th of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Control of Corruption - Governance score (0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Palestine, State of: Control of Corruption - Governance score. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/control-of-corruption-governance-score-0-100/belarus/west-bank-and-gaza/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/control-of-corruption-governance-score-0-100/belarus/west-bank-and-gaza/">Belarus vs Palestine, State of: Control of Corruption - Governance score</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Control of Corruption - Governance score (0-100)
Unit
0-100
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
204 places, 5,167 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Control of Corruption (CC) captures perceptions of the extent to which public power is used for private gain, including both petty and grand corruption, as well as capture of the state by elites and private interests. Governance score is a linear transformation of the governance estimate using hypothetical worst-case and base-case countries. It is an absolute score ranging from 0-100. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) confidence intervals (lower and upper bound). The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance score (respectively the underlying governance estimate) is based. The confidence intervals include the lower and upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Confidence intervals are a statistical range of values that likely contain the true value (of what is being estimated).