Bahrain vs Malta: Control of Corruption - Governance score
Control of Corruption - Governance score over time
- Bahrain
- Malta
How they compare
Malta currently reports 53.26 0-100 against 53 0-100 in Bahrain, a difference of 0.26 0-100.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Malta has been ahead every year.
Bahrain ranks 80th and Malta ranks 79th of 204 countries.
Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bahrain | Malta | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 50.02 0-100 | 65.88 0-100 | 15.86 0-100 | Malta |
| 2000s | 51.73 0-100 | 67.25 0-100 | 15.53 0-100 | Malta |
| 2010s | 48.41 0-100 | 64.31 0-100 | 15.9 0-100 | Malta |
| 2020s | 50.91 0-100 | 56.41 0-100 | 5.5 0-100 | Malta |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher control of corruption - governance score, Bahrain or Malta?
- Malta, at 53.26 0-100 against 53 0-100 in Bahrain as of 2024.
- What is the difference in control of corruption - governance score between Bahrain and Malta?
- 0.26 0-100, with Malta ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bahrain and Malta?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
- How do Bahrain and Malta rank globally for control of corruption - governance score?
- Bahrain ranks 80th and Malta ranks 79th of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Control of Corruption - Governance score (0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Control of Corruption (CC) captures perceptions of the extent to which public power is used for private gain, including both petty and grand corruption, as well as capture of the state by elites and private interests. Governance score is a linear transformation of the governance estimate using hypothetical worst-case and base-case countries. It is an absolute score ranging from 0-100. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) confidence intervals (lower and upper bound). The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance score (respectively the underlying governance estimate) is based. The confidence intervals include the lower and upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Confidence intervals are a statistical range of values that likely contain the true value (of what is being estimated).