South Sudan vs Yemen: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate
Control of Corruption - Governance estimate over time
- South Sudan
- Yemen
How they compare
Yemen currently reports -1.64 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -2.06 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in South Sudan, a difference of 0.42 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2010 it was South Sudan ahead.
South Sudan ranks 204th and Yemen ranks 201st of 204 countries.
Yemen has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | South Sudan | Yemen | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | -1.5 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.43 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0632 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Yemen |
| 2020s | -1.89 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.62 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.2675 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Yemen |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher control of corruption - governance estimate, South Sudan or Yemen?
- Yemen, at -1.64 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -2.06 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in South Sudan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in control of corruption - governance estimate between South Sudan and Yemen?
- 0.42 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Yemen ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Sudan and Yemen?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2024.
- How do South Sudan and Yemen rank globally for control of corruption - governance estimate?
- South Sudan ranks 204th and Yemen ranks 201st of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Control of Corruption (CC) captures perceptions of the extent to which public power is used for private gain, including both petty and grand corruption, as well as capture of the state by elites and private interests. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.