Solomon Islands vs South Africa: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate

Solomon Islands
-0.1401 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
South Africa
-0.1918 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Solomon Islands rank
95th
South Africa rank
98th

Control of Corruption - Governance estimate over time

  • Solomon Islands
  • South Africa
-0.500.51199620102024

How they compare

Solomon Islands currently reports -0.1401 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.1918 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in South Africa, a difference of 0.0517 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was South Africa ahead.

Solomon Islands ranks 95th and South Africa ranks 98th of 204 countries.

South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Solomon Islands South Africa Difference Ahead
1990s 0.4133 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.7889 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.3756 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 South Africa
2000s -0.2135 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.2671 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.4806 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 South Africa
2010s -0.3154 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0075 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.3229 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 South Africa
2020s -0.1385 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.0949 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0435 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 South Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher control of corruption - governance estimate, Solomon Islands or South Africa?
Solomon Islands, at -0.1401 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.1918 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in South Africa as of 2024.
What is the difference in control of corruption - governance estimate between Solomon Islands and South Africa?
0.0517 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Solomon Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Solomon Islands and South Africa?
26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
How do Solomon Islands and South Africa rank globally for control of corruption - governance estimate?
Solomon Islands ranks 95th and South Africa ranks 98th of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Solomon Islands vs South Africa: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/control-of-corruption-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/solomon-islands/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/control-of-corruption-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/solomon-islands/south-africa/">Solomon Islands vs South Africa: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
204 places, 5,167 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Control of Corruption (CC) captures perceptions of the extent to which public power is used for private gain, including both petty and grand corruption, as well as capture of the state by elites and private interests. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.