Pakistan vs Paraguay: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate

Pakistan
-1.07 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Paraguay
-1.02 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Pakistan rank
169th
Paraguay rank
166th

Control of Corruption - Governance estimate over time

  • Pakistan
  • Paraguay
-1.6-1.4-1.2-1-0.8-0.6199620102024

How they compare

Paraguay currently reports -1.02 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -1.07 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Pakistan, a difference of 0.05 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Pakistan ahead.

Pakistan ranks 169th and Paraguay ranks 166th of 204 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Pakistan averaged higher in 2 and Paraguay in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Pakistan Paraguay Difference Ahead
1990s -0.9786 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -1.37 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.3905 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Pakistan
2000s -0.9907 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -1.23 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.2403 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Pakistan
2010s -1.06 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.8389 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.2237 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Paraguay
2020s -0.9802 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.9419 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0383 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Paraguay

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher control of corruption - governance estimate, Pakistan or Paraguay?
Paraguay, at -1.02 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -1.07 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Pakistan as of 2024.
What is the difference in control of corruption - governance estimate between Pakistan and Paraguay?
0.05 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Paraguay ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Pakistan and Paraguay?
26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
How do Pakistan and Paraguay rank globally for control of corruption - governance estimate?
Pakistan ranks 169th and Paraguay ranks 166th of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Pakistan vs Paraguay: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 25 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/control-of-corruption-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/pakistan/paraguay/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/control-of-corruption-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/pakistan/paraguay/">Pakistan vs Paraguay: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
204 places, 5,167 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Control of Corruption (CC) captures perceptions of the extent to which public power is used for private gain, including both petty and grand corruption, as well as capture of the state by elites and private interests. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.