Oman vs Palau: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate
Control of Corruption - Governance estimate over time
- Oman
- Palau
How they compare
Oman currently reports 0.5072 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.5049 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Palau, a difference of 0.0023 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Oman ahead.
Oman ranks 64th and Palau ranks 65th of 204 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Oman averaged higher in 1 and Palau in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Oman | Palau | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.3217 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.1898 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.5114 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Oman |
| 2010s | 0.026 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1202 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0943 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Palau |
| 2020s | 0.1607 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.458 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.2973 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Palau |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher control of corruption - governance estimate, Oman or Palau?
- Oman, at 0.5072 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.5049 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Palau as of 2024.
- What is the difference in control of corruption - governance estimate between Oman and Palau?
- 0.0023 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Oman ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Oman and Palau?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2024.
- How do Oman and Palau rank globally for control of corruption - governance estimate?
- Oman ranks 64th and Palau ranks 65th of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Control of Corruption (CC) captures perceptions of the extent to which public power is used for private gain, including both petty and grand corruption, as well as capture of the state by elites and private interests. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.