Naoero vs Palau: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate
Control of Corruption - Governance estimate over time
- Naoero
- Palau
How they compare
Naoero currently reports 0.5049 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.5049 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Palau, a difference of 0 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Palau ahead.
Naoero ranks 65th and Palau ranks 65th of 204 countries.
Naoero has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Naoero | Palau | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -0.1898 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.1898 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | — |
| 2010s | 0.213 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1202 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0927 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Naoero |
| 2020s | 0.458 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.458 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher control of corruption - governance estimate, Naoero or Palau?
- Naoero, at 0.5049 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.5049 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Palau as of 2024.
- What is the difference in control of corruption - governance estimate between Naoero and Palau?
- 0 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Naoero ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Naoero and Palau?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2024.
- How do Naoero and Palau rank globally for control of corruption - governance estimate?
- Naoero ranks 65th and Palau ranks 65th of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Control of Corruption (CC) captures perceptions of the extent to which public power is used for private gain, including both petty and grand corruption, as well as capture of the state by elites and private interests. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.