Mongolia vs Zambia: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate
Control of Corruption - Governance estimate over time
- Mongolia
- Zambia
How they compare
Zambia currently reports -0.4568 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.486 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Mongolia, a difference of 0.0292 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Mongolia ahead.
Mongolia ranks 128th and Zambia ranks 127th of 204 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Mongolia averaged higher in 2 and Zambia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.2471 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.8245 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.07 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Mongolia |
| 2000s | -0.4452 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.5714 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1262 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Mongolia |
| 2010s | -0.5854 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.4153 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1701 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Zambia |
| 2020s | -0.6104 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.5142 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0962 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Zambia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher control of corruption - governance estimate, Mongolia or Zambia?
- Zambia, at -0.4568 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.486 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Mongolia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in control of corruption - governance estimate between Mongolia and Zambia?
- 0.0292 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Zambia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Zambia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
- How do Mongolia and Zambia rank globally for control of corruption - governance estimate?
- Mongolia ranks 128th and Zambia ranks 127th of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Control of Corruption (CC) captures perceptions of the extent to which public power is used for private gain, including both petty and grand corruption, as well as capture of the state by elites and private interests. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.