Mongolia vs Thailand: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate

Mongolia
-0.486 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Thailand
-0.5273 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Mongolia rank
128th
Thailand rank
131st

Control of Corruption - Governance estimate over time

  • Mongolia
  • Thailand
-0.6-0.4-0.2-00.2199620102024

How they compare

Mongolia currently reports -0.486 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.5273 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Thailand, a difference of 0.0413 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Mongolia ahead.

Mongolia ranks 128th and Thailand ranks 131st of 204 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Mongolia averaged higher in 1 and Thailand in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mongolia Thailand Difference Ahead
1990s 0.2471 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.1503 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.3974 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Mongolia
2000s -0.4452 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.3515 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0937 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Thailand
2010s -0.5854 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.3542 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.2313 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Thailand
2020s -0.6104 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.4284 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.182 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Thailand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher control of corruption - governance estimate, Mongolia or Thailand?
Mongolia, at -0.486 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.5273 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Thailand as of 2024.
What is the difference in control of corruption - governance estimate between Mongolia and Thailand?
0.0413 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Mongolia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Thailand?
26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
How do Mongolia and Thailand rank globally for control of corruption - governance estimate?
Mongolia ranks 128th and Thailand ranks 131st of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mongolia vs Thailand: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 18 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/control-of-corruption-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/mongolia/thailand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/control-of-corruption-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/mongolia/thailand/">Mongolia vs Thailand: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
204 places, 5,167 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Control of Corruption (CC) captures perceptions of the extent to which public power is used for private gain, including both petty and grand corruption, as well as capture of the state by elites and private interests. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.