Micronesia, Federated States of vs Qatar: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate

Micronesia, Federated States of
0.708 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Qatar
0.7548 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Micronesia, Federated States of rank
50th
Qatar rank
47th

Control of Corruption - Governance estimate over time

  • Micronesia, Federated States of
  • Qatar
00.511.5199620102024

How they compare

Qatar currently reports 0.7548 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.708 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Micronesia, Federated States of, a difference of 0.0468 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

That makes Qatar's figure about 1.1 times Micronesia, Federated States of's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Qatar ahead.

Micronesia, Federated States of ranks 50th and Qatar ranks 47th of 204 countries.

Qatar has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Micronesia, Federated States of Qatar Difference Ahead
2000s -0.0184 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.9043 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.9227 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Qatar
2010s 0.4395 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.9767 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.5372 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Qatar
2020s 0.402 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.8129 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.4109 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Qatar

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher control of corruption - governance estimate, Micronesia, Federated States of or Qatar?
Qatar, at 0.7548 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.708 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Micronesia, Federated States of as of 2024.
What is the difference in control of corruption - governance estimate between Micronesia, Federated States of and Qatar?
0.0468 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Qatar ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Micronesia, Federated States of and Qatar?
21 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2024.
How do Micronesia, Federated States of and Qatar rank globally for control of corruption - governance estimate?
Micronesia, Federated States of ranks 50th and Qatar ranks 47th of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Micronesia, Federated States of vs Qatar: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 18 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/control-of-corruption-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/micronesia-fed-sts/qatar/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/control-of-corruption-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/micronesia-fed-sts/qatar/">Micronesia, Federated States of vs Qatar: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
204 places, 5,167 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Control of Corruption (CC) captures perceptions of the extent to which public power is used for private gain, including both petty and grand corruption, as well as capture of the state by elites and private interests. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.