Malta vs Sao Tome and Principe: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate

Malta
0.2668 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Sao Tome and Principe
0.1842 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Malta rank
79th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
82nd

Control of Corruption - Governance estimate over time

  • Malta
  • Sao Tome and Principe
-0.500.51199620102024

How they compare

Malta currently reports 0.2668 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.1842 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 0.0826 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

That makes Malta's figure about 1.4 times Sao Tome and Principe's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Malta has been ahead every year.

Malta ranks 79th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 82nd of 204 countries.

Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malta Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
1990s 0.8903 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.3407 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.5496 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Malta
2000s 0.9582 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.1958 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 1.15 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Malta
2010s 0.8131 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.0585 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.8716 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Malta
2020s 0.4228 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1404 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.2823 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Malta

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher control of corruption - governance estimate, Malta or Sao Tome and Principe?
Malta, at 0.2668 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.1842 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2024.
What is the difference in control of corruption - governance estimate between Malta and Sao Tome and Principe?
0.0826 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Malta ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Sao Tome and Principe?
26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
How do Malta and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for control of corruption - governance estimate?
Malta ranks 79th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 82nd of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malta vs Sao Tome and Principe: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/control-of-corruption-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/malta/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/control-of-corruption-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/malta/sao-tome-and-principe/">Malta vs Sao Tome and Principe: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
204 places, 5,167 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Control of Corruption (CC) captures perceptions of the extent to which public power is used for private gain, including both petty and grand corruption, as well as capture of the state by elites and private interests. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.