Malta vs Namibia: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)

Malta
0.1773 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Namibia
0.1479 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Malta rank
81st
Namibia rank
83rd

Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) over time

  • Malta
  • Namibia
00.250.50.751199620102025

How they compare

Malta currently reports 0.1773 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.1479 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Namibia, a difference of 0.0294 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

That makes Malta's figure about 1.2 times Namibia's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Namibia ahead.

Malta ranks 81st and Namibia ranks 83rd of 208 countries.

Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malta Namibia Difference Ahead
1990s 0.8923 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.7386 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1537 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Malta
2000s 0.9568 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.2834 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.6734 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Malta
2010s 0.8124 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.4114 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.4009 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Malta
2020s 0.3946 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.2596 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.135 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Malta

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher control of corruption - governance estimate, Malta or Namibia?
Malta, at 0.1773 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.1479 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Namibia as of 2025.
What is the difference in control of corruption - governance estimate between Malta and Namibia?
0.0294 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Malta ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Namibia?
27 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2025.
How do Malta and Namibia rank globally for control of corruption - governance estimate?
Malta ranks 81st and Namibia ranks 83rd of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malta vs Namibia: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 15 November 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/control-of-corruption-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/malta/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/control-of-corruption-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/malta/namibia/">Malta vs Namibia: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
208 places, 5,432 data points, 1996–2025
Last refreshed

Control of Corruption (CC) captures perceptions of the extent to which public power is used for private gain, including both petty and grand corruption, as well as capture of the state by elites and private interests. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.