Maldives vs Trinidad and Tobago: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate

Maldives
-0.336 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Trinidad and Tobago
-0.3398 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Maldives rank
117th
Trinidad and Tobago rank
118th

Control of Corruption - Governance estimate over time

  • Maldives
  • Trinidad and Tobago
-1-0.500.51199620102024

How they compare

Maldives currently reports -0.336 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.3398 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 0.0038 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Trinidad and Tobago ahead.

Maldives ranks 117th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 118th of 204 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Maldives averaged higher in 1 and Trinidad and Tobago in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Maldives Trinidad and Tobago Difference Ahead
1990s -0.1534 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.7486 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.902 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Trinidad and Tobago
2000s -0.4363 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1213 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.5575 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Trinidad and Tobago
2010s -0.6783 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.2175 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.4608 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Trinidad and Tobago
2020s -0.2404 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.2759 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0356 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Maldives

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher control of corruption - governance estimate, Maldives or Trinidad and Tobago?
Maldives, at -0.336 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.3398 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2024.
What is the difference in control of corruption - governance estimate between Maldives and Trinidad and Tobago?
0.0038 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Maldives ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Maldives and Trinidad and Tobago?
26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
How do Maldives and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for control of corruption - governance estimate?
Maldives ranks 117th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 118th of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Maldives vs Trinidad and Tobago: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/control-of-corruption-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/maldives/trinidad-and-tobago/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/control-of-corruption-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/maldives/trinidad-and-tobago/">Maldives vs Trinidad and Tobago: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
204 places, 5,167 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Control of Corruption (CC) captures perceptions of the extent to which public power is used for private gain, including both petty and grand corruption, as well as capture of the state by elites and private interests. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.