Malaysia vs Saint Lucia: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate
Control of Corruption - Governance estimate over time
- Malaysia
- Saint Lucia
How they compare
Malaysia currently reports 0.4984 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.4493 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Saint Lucia, a difference of 0.0491 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
That makes Malaysia's figure about 1.1 times Saint Lucia's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Saint Lucia ahead.
Malaysia ranks 67th and Saint Lucia ranks 69th of 204 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Malaysia averaged higher in 1 and Saint Lucia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malaysia | Saint Lucia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0197 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.9805 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.9608 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Saint Lucia |
| 2010s | 0.2056 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.7963 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.5906 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Saint Lucia |
| 2020s | 0.3944 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.3893 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0052 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Malaysia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher control of corruption - governance estimate, Malaysia or Saint Lucia?
- Malaysia, at 0.4984 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.4493 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Saint Lucia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in control of corruption - governance estimate between Malaysia and Saint Lucia?
- 0.0491 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Malaysia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Saint Lucia?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2024.
- How do Malaysia and Saint Lucia rank globally for control of corruption - governance estimate?
- Malaysia ranks 67th and Saint Lucia ranks 69th of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Control of Corruption (CC) captures perceptions of the extent to which public power is used for private gain, including both petty and grand corruption, as well as capture of the state by elites and private interests. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.