Malaysia vs Palau: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate
Control of Corruption - Governance estimate over time
- Malaysia
- Palau
How they compare
Palau currently reports 0.5049 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.4984 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Malaysia, a difference of 0.0065 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Malaysia ahead.
Malaysia ranks 67th and Palau ranks 65th of 204 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Malaysia averaged higher in 2 and Palau in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malaysia | Palau | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -0.1206 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.1898 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0692 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Malaysia |
| 2010s | 0.2056 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1202 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0854 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Malaysia |
| 2020s | 0.3944 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.458 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0636 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Palau |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher control of corruption - governance estimate, Malaysia or Palau?
- Palau, at 0.5049 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.4984 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Malaysia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in control of corruption - governance estimate between Malaysia and Palau?
- 0.0065 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Palau ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Palau?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2024.
- How do Malaysia and Palau rank globally for control of corruption - governance estimate?
- Malaysia ranks 67th and Palau ranks 65th of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Control of Corruption (CC) captures perceptions of the extent to which public power is used for private gain, including both petty and grand corruption, as well as capture of the state by elites and private interests. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.