Macau, China vs Rwanda: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate

Macau, China
0.5734 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Rwanda
0.6255 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Macau, China rank
59th
Rwanda rank
56th

Control of Corruption - Governance estimate over time

  • Macau, China
  • Rwanda
-1-0.500.51199620102024

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 0.6255 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.5734 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Macau, China, a difference of 0.0521 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.1 times Macau, China's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Macau, China ahead.

Macau, China ranks 59th and Rwanda ranks 56th of 204 countries.

Macau, China has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Macau, China Rwanda Difference Ahead
1990s 0.4243 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.8048 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 1.23 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Macau, China
2000s 0.3714 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.3527 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.7242 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Macau, China
2010s 0.4454 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.4392 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0062 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Macau, China
2020s 0.5735 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.5635 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0101 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Macau, China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher control of corruption - governance estimate, Macau, China or Rwanda?
Rwanda, at 0.6255 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.5734 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Macau, China as of 2024.
What is the difference in control of corruption - governance estimate between Macau, China and Rwanda?
0.0521 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Macau, China and Rwanda?
26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
How do Macau, China and Rwanda rank globally for control of corruption - governance estimate?
Macau, China ranks 59th and Rwanda ranks 56th of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Macau, China vs Rwanda: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 19 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/control-of-corruption-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/macao-sar-china/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/control-of-corruption-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/macao-sar-china/rwanda/">Macau, China vs Rwanda: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
204 places, 5,167 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Control of Corruption (CC) captures perceptions of the extent to which public power is used for private gain, including both petty and grand corruption, as well as capture of the state by elites and private interests. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.