Lebanon vs Myanmar: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate
Control of Corruption - Governance estimate over time
- Lebanon
- Myanmar
How they compare
Myanmar currently reports -1.25 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -1.3 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Lebanon, a difference of 0.05 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Lebanon ahead.
Lebanon ranks 185th and Myanmar ranks 183rd of 204 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Lebanon averaged higher in 2 and Myanmar in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lebanon | Myanmar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -0.7324 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.49 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.7561 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Lebanon |
| 2000s | -0.799 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.54 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.7428 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Lebanon |
| 2010s | -1.04 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0387 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Myanmar |
| 2020s | -1.25 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.01 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.2397 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Myanmar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher control of corruption - governance estimate, Lebanon or Myanmar?
- Myanmar, at -1.25 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -1.3 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Lebanon as of 2024.
- What is the difference in control of corruption - governance estimate between Lebanon and Myanmar?
- 0.05 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Myanmar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lebanon and Myanmar?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
- How do Lebanon and Myanmar rank globally for control of corruption - governance estimate?
- Lebanon ranks 185th and Myanmar ranks 183rd of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Control of Corruption (CC) captures perceptions of the extent to which public power is used for private gain, including both petty and grand corruption, as well as capture of the state by elites and private interests. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.