Kazakhstan vs Montenegro: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate

Kazakhstan
-0.0671 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Montenegro
-0.0594 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Kazakhstan rank
92nd
Montenegro rank
91st

Control of Corruption - Governance estimate over time

  • Kazakhstan
  • Montenegro
-1.5-1-0.50199620102024

How they compare

Montenegro currently reports -0.0594 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.0671 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Kazakhstan, a difference of 0.0077 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

Across all 25 years both countries report, Montenegro has been ahead every year.

Kazakhstan ranks 92nd and Montenegro ranks 91st of 204 countries.

Montenegro has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kazakhstan Montenegro Difference Ahead
1990s -0.9385 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0026 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.941 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Montenegro
2000s -1.16 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.2008 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.9591 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Montenegro
2010s -0.7638 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.2531 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.5107 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Montenegro
2020s -0.2079 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.0276 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1803 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Montenegro

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher control of corruption - governance estimate, Kazakhstan or Montenegro?
Montenegro, at -0.0594 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.0671 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Kazakhstan as of 2024.
What is the difference in control of corruption - governance estimate between Kazakhstan and Montenegro?
0.0077 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Montenegro ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Montenegro?
25 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2024.
How do Kazakhstan and Montenegro rank globally for control of corruption - governance estimate?
Kazakhstan ranks 92nd and Montenegro ranks 91st of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kazakhstan vs Montenegro: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 23 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/control-of-corruption-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/kazakhstan/montenegro/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/control-of-corruption-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/kazakhstan/montenegro/">Kazakhstan vs Montenegro: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
204 places, 5,167 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Control of Corruption (CC) captures perceptions of the extent to which public power is used for private gain, including both petty and grand corruption, as well as capture of the state by elites and private interests. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.