Jordan vs Malta: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate

Jordan
0.2722 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Malta
0.2668 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Jordan rank
78th
Malta rank
79th

Control of Corruption - Governance estimate over time

  • Jordan
  • Malta
00.250.50.751199620102024

How they compare

Jordan currently reports 0.2722 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.2668 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Malta, a difference of 0.0054 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Malta ahead.

Jordan ranks 78th and Malta ranks 79th of 204 countries.

Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Jordan Malta Difference Ahead
1990s 0.252 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.8903 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.6383 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Malta
2000s 0.1308 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.9582 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.8275 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Malta
2010s 0.127 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.8131 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.6861 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Malta
2020s 0.1119 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.4228 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.3109 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Malta

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher control of corruption - governance estimate, Jordan or Malta?
Jordan, at 0.2722 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.2668 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Malta as of 2024.
What is the difference in control of corruption - governance estimate between Jordan and Malta?
0.0054 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Jordan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Malta?
26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
How do Jordan and Malta rank globally for control of corruption - governance estimate?
Jordan ranks 78th and Malta ranks 79th of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Jordan vs Malta: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 16 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/control-of-corruption-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/jordan/malta/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/control-of-corruption-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/jordan/malta/">Jordan vs Malta: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
204 places, 5,167 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Control of Corruption (CC) captures perceptions of the extent to which public power is used for private gain, including both petty and grand corruption, as well as capture of the state by elites and private interests. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.