Indonesia vs Serbia: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate

Indonesia
-0.5446 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Serbia
-0.5608 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Indonesia rank
132nd
Serbia rank
134th

Control of Corruption - Governance estimate over time

  • Indonesia
  • Serbia
-1.2-1-0.75-0.5-0.25199620102024

How they compare

Indonesia currently reports -0.5446 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.5608 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Serbia, a difference of 0.0162 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Indonesia ahead.

Indonesia ranks 132nd and Serbia ranks 134th of 204 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Indonesia averaged higher in 2 and Serbia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Indonesia Serbia Difference Ahead
1990s -1.03 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -1.16 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1319 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Indonesia
2000s -0.9661 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.6125 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.3536 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Serbia
2010s -0.5672 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.3514 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.2158 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Serbia
2020s -0.424 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.4773 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0533 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Indonesia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher control of corruption - governance estimate, Indonesia or Serbia?
Indonesia, at -0.5446 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.5608 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Serbia as of 2024.
What is the difference in control of corruption - governance estimate between Indonesia and Serbia?
0.0162 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Indonesia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Indonesia and Serbia?
26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
How do Indonesia and Serbia rank globally for control of corruption - governance estimate?
Indonesia ranks 132nd and Serbia ranks 134th of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Indonesia vs Serbia: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 23 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/control-of-corruption-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/indonesia/serbia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/control-of-corruption-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/indonesia/serbia/">Indonesia vs Serbia: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
204 places, 5,167 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Control of Corruption (CC) captures perceptions of the extent to which public power is used for private gain, including both petty and grand corruption, as well as capture of the state by elites and private interests. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.