Iceland vs Monaco: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate
Control of Corruption - Governance estimate over time
- Iceland
- Monaco
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 1.83 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 1.8 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Monaco, a difference of 0.03 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Iceland has been ahead every year.
Iceland ranks 11th and Monaco ranks 12th of 204 countries.
Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | Monaco | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1.91 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.8 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1115 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Iceland |
| 2020s | 1.77 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.3 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.4669 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Iceland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher control of corruption - governance estimate, Iceland or Monaco?
- Iceland, at 1.83 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 1.8 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Monaco as of 2024.
- What is the difference in control of corruption - governance estimate between Iceland and Monaco?
- 0.03 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Monaco?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2024.
- How do Iceland and Monaco rank globally for control of corruption - governance estimate?
- Iceland ranks 11th and Monaco ranks 12th of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Control of Corruption (CC) captures perceptions of the extent to which public power is used for private gain, including both petty and grand corruption, as well as capture of the state by elites and private interests. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.