Guinea vs Iraq: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate

Guinea
-1.17 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Iraq
-1.21 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Guinea rank
176th
Iraq rank
177th

Control of Corruption - Governance estimate over time

  • Guinea
  • Iraq
-1.8-1.5-1.2-1-0.75-0.5199620102024

How they compare

Guinea currently reports -1.17 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -1.21 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Iraq, a difference of 0.04 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Guinea has been ahead every year.

Guinea ranks 176th and Iraq ranks 177th of 204 countries.

Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guinea Iraq Difference Ahead
1990s -0.7153 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -1.62 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.9066 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Guinea
2000s -1.05 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -1.4 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.3461 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Guinea
2010s -1.11 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -1.36 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.2495 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Guinea
2020s -1.01 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -1.35 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.3409 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher control of corruption - governance estimate, Guinea or Iraq?
Guinea, at -1.17 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -1.21 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Iraq as of 2024.
What is the difference in control of corruption - governance estimate between Guinea and Iraq?
0.04 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea and Iraq?
26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
How do Guinea and Iraq rank globally for control of corruption - governance estimate?
Guinea ranks 176th and Iraq ranks 177th of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guinea vs Iraq: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 18 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/control-of-corruption-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/guinea/iraq/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/control-of-corruption-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/guinea/iraq/">Guinea vs Iraq: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
204 places, 5,167 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Control of Corruption (CC) captures perceptions of the extent to which public power is used for private gain, including both petty and grand corruption, as well as capture of the state by elites and private interests. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.