Guam vs Monaco: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) over time
- Guam
- Monaco
How they compare
Guam currently reports 1.18 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 1.18 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Monaco, a difference of 0 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
Across all 11 years both countries report, Monaco has been ahead every year.
Guam ranks 28th and Monaco ranks 28th of 208 countries.
Monaco has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guam | Monaco | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1.17 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.8 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.6244 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Monaco |
| 2020s | 1.18 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.28 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1041 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Monaco |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher control of corruption - governance estimate, Guam or Monaco?
- Guam, at 1.18 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 1.18 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Monaco as of 2025.
- What is the difference in control of corruption - governance estimate between Guam and Monaco?
- 0 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Guam ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guam and Monaco?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2025.
- How do Guam and Monaco rank globally for control of corruption - governance estimate?
- Guam ranks 28th and Monaco ranks 28th of 208 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Control of Corruption (CC) captures perceptions of the extent to which public power is used for private gain, including both petty and grand corruption, as well as capture of the state by elites and private interests. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.