Grenada vs Palau: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)

Grenada
0.5044 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Palau
0.5134 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Grenada rank
69th
Palau rank
68th

Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) over time

  • Grenada
  • Palau
-0.2500.250.50.751199620102025

How they compare

Palau currently reports 0.5134 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.5044 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Grenada, a difference of 0.009 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 18 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Grenada ahead.

Grenada ranks 69th and Palau ranks 68th of 208 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Grenada averaged higher in 2 and Palau in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Grenada Palau Difference Ahead
2000s 0.4671 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.1735 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.6406 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Grenada
2010s 0.4653 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1323 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.333 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Grenada
2020s 0.3964 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.4747 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0783 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Palau

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher control of corruption - governance estimate, Grenada or Palau?
Palau, at 0.5134 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.5044 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Grenada as of 2025.
What is the difference in control of corruption - governance estimate between Grenada and Palau?
0.009 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Palau ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Grenada and Palau?
18 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2025.
How do Grenada and Palau rank globally for control of corruption - governance estimate?
Grenada ranks 69th and Palau ranks 68th of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Grenada vs Palau: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 15 November 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/control-of-corruption-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/grenada/palau/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/control-of-corruption-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/grenada/palau/">Grenada vs Palau: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
208 places, 5,432 data points, 1996–2025
Last refreshed

Control of Corruption (CC) captures perceptions of the extent to which public power is used for private gain, including both petty and grand corruption, as well as capture of the state by elites and private interests. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.