Grenada vs Nauru: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate

Grenada
0.479 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Nauru
0.5049 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Grenada rank
68th
Nauru rank
65th

Control of Corruption - Governance estimate over time

  • Grenada
  • Nauru
-0.2500.250.50.751199620102024

How they compare

Nauru currently reports 0.5049 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.479 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Grenada, a difference of 0.0259 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

That makes Nauru's figure about 1.1 times Grenada's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 18 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Grenada ahead.

Grenada ranks 68th and Nauru ranks 65th of 204 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Grenada averaged higher in 2 and Nauru in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Grenada Nauru Difference Ahead
2000s 0.4622 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.1923 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.6546 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Grenada
2010s 0.4632 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.213 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.2502 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Grenada
2020s 0.3708 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.458 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0872 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Nauru

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher control of corruption - governance estimate, Grenada or Nauru?
Nauru, at 0.5049 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.479 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Grenada as of 2024.
What is the difference in control of corruption - governance estimate between Grenada and Nauru?
0.0259 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Nauru ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Grenada and Nauru?
18 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2024.
How do Grenada and Nauru rank globally for control of corruption - governance estimate?
Grenada ranks 68th and Nauru ranks 65th of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Grenada vs Nauru: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 17 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/control-of-corruption-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/grenada/naoero/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/control-of-corruption-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/grenada/naoero/">Grenada vs Nauru: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
204 places, 5,167 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Control of Corruption (CC) captures perceptions of the extent to which public power is used for private gain, including both petty and grand corruption, as well as capture of the state by elites and private interests. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.