Grenada vs Malaysia: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate
Control of Corruption - Governance estimate over time
- Grenada
- Malaysia
How they compare
Malaysia currently reports 0.4984 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.479 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Grenada, a difference of 0.0194 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Grenada ahead.
Grenada ranks 68th and Malaysia ranks 67th of 204 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Grenada averaged higher in 3 and Malaysia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Grenada | Malaysia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.8924 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.2393 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.6531 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Grenada |
| 2000s | 0.6651 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0481 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.617 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Grenada |
| 2010s | 0.4632 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.2056 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.2576 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Grenada |
| 2020s | 0.3708 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.3944 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0236 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Malaysia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher control of corruption - governance estimate, Grenada or Malaysia?
- Malaysia, at 0.4984 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.479 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Grenada as of 2024.
- What is the difference in control of corruption - governance estimate between Grenada and Malaysia?
- 0.0194 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Malaysia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Grenada and Malaysia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
- How do Grenada and Malaysia rank globally for control of corruption - governance estimate?
- Grenada ranks 68th and Malaysia ranks 67th of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Control of Corruption (CC) captures perceptions of the extent to which public power is used for private gain, including both petty and grand corruption, as well as capture of the state by elites and private interests. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.