French Polynesia vs Vanuatu: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) over time
- French Polynesia
- Vanuatu
How they compare
Vanuatu currently reports -0.1816 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.1973 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in French Polynesia, a difference of 0.0157 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Vanuatu has been ahead every year.
French Polynesia ranks 103rd and Vanuatu ranks 102nd of 208 countries.
Vanuatu has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher control of corruption - governance estimate, French Polynesia or Vanuatu?
- Vanuatu, at -0.1816 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.1973 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in French Polynesia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in control of corruption - governance estimate between French Polynesia and Vanuatu?
- 0.0157 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Vanuatu ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for French Polynesia and Vanuatu?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2021 to 2025.
- How do French Polynesia and Vanuatu rank globally for control of corruption - governance estimate?
- French Polynesia ranks 103rd and Vanuatu ranks 102nd of 208 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Control of Corruption (CC) captures perceptions of the extent to which public power is used for private gain, including both petty and grand corruption, as well as capture of the state by elites and private interests. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.