France vs San Marino: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate
Control of Corruption - Governance estimate over time
- France
- San Marino
How they compare
France currently reports 1.22 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 1.18 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in San Marino, a difference of 0.04 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
Across all 10 years both countries report, France has been ahead every year.
France ranks 29th and San Marino ranks 31st of 204 countries.
France has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | France | San Marino | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1.35 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.17 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1817 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | France |
| 2020s | 1.32 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.18 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.141 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | France |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher control of corruption - governance estimate, France or San Marino?
- France, at 1.22 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 1.18 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in San Marino as of 2024.
- What is the difference in control of corruption - governance estimate between France and San Marino?
- 0.04 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with France ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for France and San Marino?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2024.
- How do France and San Marino rank globally for control of corruption - governance estimate?
- France ranks 29th and San Marino ranks 31st of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Control of Corruption (CC) captures perceptions of the extent to which public power is used for private gain, including both petty and grand corruption, as well as capture of the state by elites and private interests. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.