Eswatini vs Papua New Guinea: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate

Eswatini
-0.7852 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Papua New Guinea
-0.7974 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Eswatini rank
152nd
Papua New Guinea rank
153rd

Control of Corruption - Governance estimate over time

  • Eswatini
  • Papua New Guinea
-1-0.50199620102024

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports -0.7852 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.7974 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 0.0122 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Eswatini ahead.

Eswatini ranks 152nd and Papua New Guinea ranks 153rd of 204 countries.

Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Papua New Guinea Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0199 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.3468 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.3667 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Eswatini
2000s -0.025 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.9966 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.9716 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Eswatini
2010s -0.1964 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.981 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.7845 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Eswatini
2020s -0.581 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.6385 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0575 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher control of corruption - governance estimate, Eswatini or Papua New Guinea?
Eswatini, at -0.7852 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.7974 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Papua New Guinea as of 2024.
What is the difference in control of corruption - governance estimate between Eswatini and Papua New Guinea?
0.0122 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Papua New Guinea?
26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
How do Eswatini and Papua New Guinea rank globally for control of corruption - governance estimate?
Eswatini ranks 152nd and Papua New Guinea ranks 153rd of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Papua New Guinea: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 27 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/control-of-corruption-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/eswatini/papua-new-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/control-of-corruption-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/eswatini/papua-new-guinea/">Eswatini vs Papua New Guinea: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
204 places, 5,167 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Control of Corruption (CC) captures perceptions of the extent to which public power is used for private gain, including both petty and grand corruption, as well as capture of the state by elites and private interests. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.