Estonia vs Hong Kong, China: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate

Estonia
1.67 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Hong Kong, China
1.57 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Estonia rank
15th
Hong Kong, China rank
18th

Control of Corruption - Governance estimate over time

  • Estonia
  • Hong Kong, China
0.511.5199620102024

How they compare

Estonia currently reports 1.67 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 1.57 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Hong Kong, China, a difference of 0.1 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

That makes Estonia's figure about 1.1 times Hong Kong, China's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Hong Kong, China ahead.

Estonia ranks 15th and Hong Kong, China ranks 18th of 204 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Estonia averaged higher in 1 and Hong Kong, China in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Estonia Hong Kong, China Difference Ahead
1990s 0.7129 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 1.27 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.5586 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Hong Kong, China
2000s 0.933 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 1.58 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.645 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Hong Kong, China
2010s 1.26 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 1.67 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.4065 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Hong Kong, China
2020s 1.61 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 1.6 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0174 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Estonia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher control of corruption - governance estimate, Estonia or Hong Kong, China?
Estonia, at 1.67 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 1.57 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Hong Kong, China as of 2024.
What is the difference in control of corruption - governance estimate between Estonia and Hong Kong, China?
0.1 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Estonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Hong Kong, China?
26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
How do Estonia and Hong Kong, China rank globally for control of corruption - governance estimate?
Estonia ranks 15th and Hong Kong, China ranks 18th of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Estonia vs Hong Kong, China: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/control-of-corruption-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/estonia/hong-kong-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/control-of-corruption-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/estonia/hong-kong-sar-china/">Estonia vs Hong Kong, China: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
204 places, 5,167 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Control of Corruption (CC) captures perceptions of the extent to which public power is used for private gain, including both petty and grand corruption, as well as capture of the state by elites and private interests. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.