El Salvador vs Serbia: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate

El Salvador
-0.5766 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Serbia
-0.5608 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
El Salvador rank
137th
Serbia rank
134th

Control of Corruption - Governance estimate over time

  • El Salvador
  • Serbia
-1.2-1-0.75-0.5-0.25199620102024

How they compare

Serbia currently reports -0.5608 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.5766 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in El Salvador, a difference of 0.0158 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was El Salvador ahead.

El Salvador ranks 137th and Serbia ranks 134th of 204 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, El Salvador averaged higher in 2 and Serbia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade El Salvador Serbia Difference Ahead
1990s -0.8116 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -1.16 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.3512 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 El Salvador
2000s -0.4728 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.6125 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1396 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 El Salvador
2010s -0.4382 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.3514 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0869 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Serbia
2020s -0.5878 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.4773 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1105 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Serbia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher control of corruption - governance estimate, El Salvador or Serbia?
Serbia, at -0.5608 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.5766 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in El Salvador as of 2024.
What is the difference in control of corruption - governance estimate between El Salvador and Serbia?
0.0158 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Serbia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Serbia?
26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
How do El Salvador and Serbia rank globally for control of corruption - governance estimate?
El Salvador ranks 137th and Serbia ranks 134th of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

El Salvador vs Serbia: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/control-of-corruption-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/el-salvador/serbia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/control-of-corruption-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/el-salvador/serbia/">El Salvador vs Serbia: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
204 places, 5,167 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Control of Corruption (CC) captures perceptions of the extent to which public power is used for private gain, including both petty and grand corruption, as well as capture of the state by elites and private interests. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.