Ecuador vs Eswatini: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate

Ecuador
-0.7757 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Eswatini
-0.7852 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Ecuador rank
151st
Eswatini rank
152nd

Control of Corruption - Governance estimate over time

  • Ecuador
  • Eswatini
-0.75-0.5-0.2500.25199620102024

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports -0.7757 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.7852 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Eswatini, a difference of 0.0095 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Eswatini ahead.

Ecuador ranks 151st and Eswatini ranks 152nd of 204 countries.

Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Eswatini Difference Ahead
1990s -0.6241 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0199 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.644 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Eswatini
2000s -0.7634 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.025 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.7383 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Eswatini
2010s -0.6745 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.1964 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.478 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Eswatini
2020s -0.6604 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.581 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0794 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher control of corruption - governance estimate, Ecuador or Eswatini?
Ecuador, at -0.7757 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.7852 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Eswatini as of 2024.
What is the difference in control of corruption - governance estimate between Ecuador and Eswatini?
0.0095 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Eswatini?
26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
How do Ecuador and Eswatini rank globally for control of corruption - governance estimate?
Ecuador ranks 151st and Eswatini ranks 152nd of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Eswatini: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 17 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/control-of-corruption-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/ecuador/eswatini/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/control-of-corruption-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/ecuador/eswatini/">Ecuador vs Eswatini: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
204 places, 5,167 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Control of Corruption (CC) captures perceptions of the extent to which public power is used for private gain, including both petty and grand corruption, as well as capture of the state by elites and private interests. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.