Dominican Republic vs Republic of Moldova: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate

Dominican Republic
-0.2655 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Republic of Moldova
-0.2916 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Dominican Republic rank
107th
Republic of Moldova rank
109th

Control of Corruption - Governance estimate over time

  • Dominican Republic
  • Republic of Moldova
-1.2-1-0.75-0.5-0.25199620102024

How they compare

Dominican Republic currently reports -0.2655 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.2916 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Republic of Moldova, a difference of 0.0261 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Republic of Moldova ahead.

Dominican Republic ranks 107th and Republic of Moldova ranks 109th of 204 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Dominican Republic averaged higher in 2 and Republic of Moldova in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Dominican Republic Republic of Moldova Difference Ahead
1990s -0.3561 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.1928 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1633 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Republic of Moldova
2000s -0.7147 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.8741 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1593 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Dominican Republic
2010s -0.7808 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.8562 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0754 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Dominican Republic
2020s -0.4739 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.4521 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0218 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Republic of Moldova

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher control of corruption - governance estimate, Dominican Republic or Republic of Moldova?
Dominican Republic, at -0.2655 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.2916 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Republic of Moldova as of 2024.
What is the difference in control of corruption - governance estimate between Dominican Republic and Republic of Moldova?
0.0261 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Dominican Republic ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Republic of Moldova?
26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
How do Dominican Republic and Republic of Moldova rank globally for control of corruption - governance estimate?
Dominican Republic ranks 107th and Republic of Moldova ranks 109th of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Dominican Republic vs Republic of Moldova: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 26 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/control-of-corruption-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/dominican-republic/moldova/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/control-of-corruption-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/dominican-republic/moldova/">Dominican Republic vs Republic of Moldova: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
204 places, 5,167 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Control of Corruption (CC) captures perceptions of the extent to which public power is used for private gain, including both petty and grand corruption, as well as capture of the state by elites and private interests. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.