Dominica vs Palau: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate

Dominica
0.533 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Palau
0.5049 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Dominica rank
62nd
Palau rank
65th

Control of Corruption - Governance estimate over time

  • Dominica
  • Palau
-0.2500.250.50.751199620102024

How they compare

Dominica currently reports 0.533 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.5049 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Palau, a difference of 0.0281 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

That makes Dominica's figure about 1.1 times Palau's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Dominica ahead.

Dominica ranks 62nd and Palau ranks 65th of 204 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Dominica averaged higher in 2 and Palau in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Dominica Palau Difference Ahead
2000s 0.7032 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.1898 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.893 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Dominica
2010s 0.679 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1202 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.5587 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Dominica
2020s 0.4295 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.458 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0285 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Palau

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher control of corruption - governance estimate, Dominica or Palau?
Dominica, at 0.533 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.5049 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Palau as of 2024.
What is the difference in control of corruption - governance estimate between Dominica and Palau?
0.0281 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Dominica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Dominica and Palau?
17 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2024.
How do Dominica and Palau rank globally for control of corruption - governance estimate?
Dominica ranks 62nd and Palau ranks 65th of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Dominica vs Palau: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 23 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/control-of-corruption-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/dominica/palau/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/control-of-corruption-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/dominica/palau/">Dominica vs Palau: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
204 places, 5,167 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Control of Corruption (CC) captures perceptions of the extent to which public power is used for private gain, including both petty and grand corruption, as well as capture of the state by elites and private interests. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.