Cuba vs Ghana: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate

Cuba
-0.2263 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Ghana
-0.1935 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Cuba rank
101st
Ghana rank
99th

Control of Corruption - Governance estimate over time

  • Cuba
  • Ghana
-0.5-0.2500.250.5199620102024

How they compare

Ghana currently reports -0.1935 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.2263 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Cuba, a difference of 0.0328 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Cuba ahead.

Cuba ranks 101st and Ghana ranks 99th of 204 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 3 and Ghana in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cuba Ghana Difference Ahead
1990s -0.1143 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.394 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.2797 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Cuba
2000s 0.1303 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.1889 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.3191 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Cuba
2010s 0.2225 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.1151 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.3376 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Cuba
2020s -0.1954 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.1336 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0618 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Ghana

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher control of corruption - governance estimate, Cuba or Ghana?
Ghana, at -0.1935 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.2263 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Cuba as of 2024.
What is the difference in control of corruption - governance estimate between Cuba and Ghana?
0.0328 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Ghana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Ghana?
26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
How do Cuba and Ghana rank globally for control of corruption - governance estimate?
Cuba ranks 101st and Ghana ranks 99th of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cuba vs Ghana: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 18 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/control-of-corruption-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/cuba/ghana/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/control-of-corruption-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/cuba/ghana/">Cuba vs Ghana: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
204 places, 5,167 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Control of Corruption (CC) captures perceptions of the extent to which public power is used for private gain, including both petty and grand corruption, as well as capture of the state by elites and private interests. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.