Croatia vs Sao Tome and Principe: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate

Croatia
0.1487 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Sao Tome and Principe
0.1842 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Croatia rank
83rd
Sao Tome and Principe rank
82nd

Control of Corruption - Governance estimate over time

  • Croatia
  • Sao Tome and Principe
-0.75-0.5-0.2500.250.5199620102024

How they compare

Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 0.1842 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.1487 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Croatia, a difference of 0.0355 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

That makes Sao Tome and Principe's figure about 1.2 times Croatia's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Sao Tome and Principe ahead.

Croatia ranks 83rd and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 82nd of 205 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Croatia averaged higher in 2 and Sao Tome and Principe in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Croatia Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
1990s -0.7115 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.3407 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 1.05 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Sao Tome and Principe
2000s 0.1958 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.1958 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.3917 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Croatia
2010s 0.0923 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.0585 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1507 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Croatia
2020s 0.1201 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1404 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0204 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Sao Tome and Principe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher control of corruption - governance estimate, Croatia or Sao Tome and Principe?
Sao Tome and Principe, at 0.1842 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.1487 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Croatia as of 2024.
What is the difference in control of corruption - governance estimate between Croatia and Sao Tome and Principe?
0.0355 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Sao Tome and Principe?
26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
How do Croatia and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for control of corruption - governance estimate?
Croatia ranks 83rd and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 82nd of 205 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Croatia vs Sao Tome and Principe: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/control-of-corruption-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/croatia/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/control-of-corruption-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/croatia/sao-tome-and-principe/">Croatia vs Sao Tome and Principe: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
205 places, 5,191 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Control of Corruption (CC) captures perceptions of the extent to which public power is used for private gain, including both petty and grand corruption, as well as capture of the state by elites and private interests. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.