Croatia vs Namibia: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)

Croatia
0.1281 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Namibia
0.1479 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Croatia rank
86th
Namibia rank
83rd

Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) over time

  • Croatia
  • Namibia
-0.500.51199620102025

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 0.1479 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.1281 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Croatia, a difference of 0.0198 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

That makes Namibia's figure about 1.2 times Croatia's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Namibia ahead.

Croatia ranks 86th and Namibia ranks 83rd of 208 countries.

Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Croatia Namibia Difference Ahead
1990s -0.7139 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.7386 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 1.45 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Namibia
2000s 0.2022 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.2834 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0813 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Namibia
2010s 0.0893 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.4114 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.3221 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Namibia
2020s 0.1173 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.2596 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1423 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher control of corruption - governance estimate, Croatia or Namibia?
Namibia, at 0.1479 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.1281 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Croatia as of 2025.
What is the difference in control of corruption - governance estimate between Croatia and Namibia?
0.0198 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Namibia?
27 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2025.
How do Croatia and Namibia rank globally for control of corruption - governance estimate?
Croatia ranks 86th and Namibia ranks 83rd of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Croatia vs Namibia: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 15 November 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/control-of-corruption-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/croatia/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/control-of-corruption-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/croatia/namibia/">Croatia vs Namibia: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
208 places, 5,432 data points, 1996–2025
Last refreshed

Control of Corruption (CC) captures perceptions of the extent to which public power is used for private gain, including both petty and grand corruption, as well as capture of the state by elites and private interests. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.