Costa Rica vs Micronesia, Federated States of: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate

Costa Rica
0.6792 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Micronesia, Federated States of
0.708 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Costa Rica rank
53rd
Micronesia, Federated States of rank
50th

Control of Corruption - Governance estimate over time

  • Costa Rica
  • Micronesia, Federated States of
00.51199620102024

How they compare

Micronesia, Federated States of currently reports 0.708 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.6792 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Costa Rica, a difference of 0.0288 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Costa Rica ahead.

Costa Rica ranks 53rd and Micronesia, Federated States of ranks 50th of 204 countries.

Costa Rica has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Costa Rica Micronesia, Federated States of Difference Ahead
2000s 0.4544 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.0184 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.4728 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Costa Rica
2010s 0.7005 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.4395 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.261 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Costa Rica
2020s 0.6542 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.402 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.2522 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Costa Rica

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher control of corruption - governance estimate, Costa Rica or Micronesia, Federated States of?
Micronesia, Federated States of, at 0.708 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.6792 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Costa Rica as of 2024.
What is the difference in control of corruption - governance estimate between Costa Rica and Micronesia, Federated States of?
0.0288 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Micronesia, Federated States of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Micronesia, Federated States of?
21 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2024.
How do Costa Rica and Micronesia, Federated States of rank globally for control of corruption - governance estimate?
Costa Rica ranks 53rd and Micronesia, Federated States of ranks 50th of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Costa Rica vs Micronesia, Federated States of: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 27 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/control-of-corruption-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/costa-rica/micronesia-fed-sts/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/control-of-corruption-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/costa-rica/micronesia-fed-sts/">Costa Rica vs Micronesia, Federated States of: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
204 places, 5,167 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Control of Corruption (CC) captures perceptions of the extent to which public power is used for private gain, including both petty and grand corruption, as well as capture of the state by elites and private interests. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.