China vs Slovakia: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate

China
0.0887 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Slovakia
0.1108 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
China rank
88th
Slovakia rank
87th

Control of Corruption - Governance estimate over time

  • China
  • Slovakia
-0.75-0.5-0.2500.250.5199620102024

How they compare

Slovakia currently reports 0.1108 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.0887 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in China, a difference of 0.0221 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

That makes Slovakia's figure about 1.2 times China's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Slovakia has been ahead every year.

China ranks 88th and Slovakia ranks 87th of 204 countries.

Slovakia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Slovakia Difference Ahead
1990s -0.3821 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.4069 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.7891 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Slovakia
2000s -0.5902 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.3191 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.9093 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Slovakia
2010s -0.2733 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.2186 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.4919 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Slovakia
2020s 0.0709 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.33 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.2591 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Slovakia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher control of corruption - governance estimate, China or Slovakia?
Slovakia, at 0.1108 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.0887 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in China as of 2024.
What is the difference in control of corruption - governance estimate between China and Slovakia?
0.0221 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Slovakia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Slovakia?
26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
How do China and Slovakia rank globally for control of corruption - governance estimate?
China ranks 88th and Slovakia ranks 87th of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Slovakia: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 24 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/control-of-corruption-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/china/slovak-republic/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/control-of-corruption-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/china/slovak-republic/">China vs Slovakia: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
204 places, 5,167 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Control of Corruption (CC) captures perceptions of the extent to which public power is used for private gain, including both petty and grand corruption, as well as capture of the state by elites and private interests. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.