China vs Montenegro: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate

China
0.0887 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Montenegro
-0.0594 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
China rank
88th
Montenegro rank
91st

Control of Corruption - Governance estimate over time

  • China
  • Montenegro
-0.6-0.4-0.2-00.2199620102024

How they compare

China currently reports 0.0887 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.0594 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Montenegro, a difference of 0.1481 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

That makes China's figure about 1.5 times Montenegro's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 25 shared years of data; in 1998 it was Montenegro ahead.

China ranks 88th and Montenegro ranks 91st of 204 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, China averaged higher in 1 and Montenegro in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Montenegro Difference Ahead
1990s -0.4335 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0026 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.4361 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Montenegro
2000s -0.5902 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.2008 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.3894 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Montenegro
2010s -0.2733 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.2531 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0202 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Montenegro
2020s 0.0709 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.0276 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0985 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher control of corruption - governance estimate, China or Montenegro?
China, at 0.0887 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.0594 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Montenegro as of 2024.
What is the difference in control of corruption - governance estimate between China and Montenegro?
0.1481 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Montenegro?
25 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2024.
How do China and Montenegro rank globally for control of corruption - governance estimate?
China ranks 88th and Montenegro ranks 91st of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Montenegro: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 21 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/control-of-corruption-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/china/montenegro/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/control-of-corruption-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/china/montenegro/">China vs Montenegro: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
204 places, 5,167 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Control of Corruption (CC) captures perceptions of the extent to which public power is used for private gain, including both petty and grand corruption, as well as capture of the state by elites and private interests. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.