Chile vs United Arab Emirates: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate

Chile
1.11 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
United Arab Emirates
1.17 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Chile rank
36th
United Arab Emirates rank
35th

Control of Corruption - Governance estimate over time

  • Chile
  • United Arab Emirates
00.511.5199620102024

How they compare

United Arab Emirates currently reports 1.17 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 1.11 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Chile, a difference of 0.06 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

That makes United Arab Emirates's figure about 1.1 times Chile's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Chile ahead.

Chile ranks 36th and United Arab Emirates ranks 35th of 204 countries.

Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile United Arab Emirates Difference Ahead
1990s 1.48 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.2408 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 1.24 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Chile
2000s 1.41 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.7493 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.664 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Chile
2010s 1.3 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 1.06 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.2424 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Chile
2020s 1.13 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 1.06 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0728 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher control of corruption - governance estimate, Chile or United Arab Emirates?
United Arab Emirates, at 1.17 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 1.11 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Chile as of 2024.
What is the difference in control of corruption - governance estimate between Chile and United Arab Emirates?
0.06 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with United Arab Emirates ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and United Arab Emirates?
26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
How do Chile and United Arab Emirates rank globally for control of corruption - governance estimate?
Chile ranks 36th and United Arab Emirates ranks 35th of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs United Arab Emirates: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 23 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/control-of-corruption-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/chile/united-arab-emirates/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/control-of-corruption-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/chile/united-arab-emirates/">Chile vs United Arab Emirates: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
204 places, 5,167 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Control of Corruption (CC) captures perceptions of the extent to which public power is used for private gain, including both petty and grand corruption, as well as capture of the state by elites and private interests. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.