Chile vs Lithuania: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)

Chile
1.1 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Lithuania
1.02 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Chile rank
35th
Lithuania rank
37th

Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) over time

  • Chile
  • Lithuania
00.511.5199620102025

How they compare

Chile currently reports 1.1 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 1.02 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Lithuania, a difference of 0.08 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

That makes Chile's figure about 1.1 times Lithuania's.

Across all 27 years both countries report, Chile has been ahead every year.

Chile ranks 35th and Lithuania ranks 37th of 208 countries.

Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Lithuania Difference Ahead
1990s 1.48 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.3294 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 1.15 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Chile
2000s 1.41 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.2988 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 1.11 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Chile
2010s 1.3 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.5955 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.7045 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Chile
2020s 1.14 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.9122 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.2231 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher control of corruption - governance estimate, Chile or Lithuania?
Chile, at 1.1 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 1.02 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Lithuania as of 2025.
What is the difference in control of corruption - governance estimate between Chile and Lithuania?
0.08 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Lithuania?
27 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2025.
How do Chile and Lithuania rank globally for control of corruption - governance estimate?
Chile ranks 35th and Lithuania ranks 37th of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Lithuania: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 15 November 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/control-of-corruption-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/chile/lithuania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/control-of-corruption-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/chile/lithuania/">Chile vs Lithuania: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
208 places, 5,432 data points, 1996–2025
Last refreshed

Control of Corruption (CC) captures perceptions of the extent to which public power is used for private gain, including both petty and grand corruption, as well as capture of the state by elites and private interests. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.