Central African Republic vs Congo: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate

Central African Republic
-1.31 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Congo
-1.42 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Central African Republic rank
187th
Congo rank
190th

Control of Corruption - Governance estimate over time

  • Central African Republic
  • Congo
-1.4-1.2-1-0.8-0.6-0.4199620102024

How they compare

Central African Republic currently reports -1.31 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -1.42 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Congo, a difference of 0.11 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Congo ahead.

Central African Republic ranks 187th and Congo ranks 190th of 204 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Central African Republic averaged higher in 2 and Congo in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central African Republic Congo Difference Ahead
1990s -1.24 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.7118 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.524 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Congo
2000s -1.15 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -1.03 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1244 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Congo
2010s -1.16 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -1.27 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1132 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Central African Republic
2020s -1.32 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -1.38 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0655 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Central African Republic

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher control of corruption - governance estimate, Central African Republic or Congo?
Central African Republic, at -1.31 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -1.42 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Congo as of 2024.
What is the difference in control of corruption - governance estimate between Central African Republic and Congo?
0.11 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Central African Republic ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Congo?
26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
How do Central African Republic and Congo rank globally for control of corruption - governance estimate?
Central African Republic ranks 187th and Congo ranks 190th of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central African Republic vs Congo: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 21 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/control-of-corruption-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/central-african-republic/congo-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/control-of-corruption-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/central-african-republic/congo-rep/">Central African Republic vs Congo: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
204 places, 5,167 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Control of Corruption (CC) captures perceptions of the extent to which public power is used for private gain, including both petty and grand corruption, as well as capture of the state by elites and private interests. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.